#4 Secret to Better Motorcycle Photography is Take a lot of Photos
- June 2nd, 2010
- Posted in Secret #4 to Better Motorcycle Photography . Secrets to Better Motorcycle Photography
- By Tim Wemple
- Write comment
Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop. – Ansel Adams
It’s my goal, at least in these initial secrets to better motorcycle pictures, to give you them in order of their ability to transform your photos. Keeping your perspective low, using the Rule of Thirds and knowing your subject will make a huge difference in your photography. This next secret though you may not think is all that importance when compared to the other three. But I’m ranking it fourth because I believe it is a secret that can really make a difference in your photos as well as have some very practical implications.
The third secret to better photos is to take more photos—hundreds, even thousands at your next outing. More when it comes to photography is always better than less. If you don’t follow this secret the other three wont help you. In fact nothing I will tell you after this will be of much use because it really does take a lot of photos to get one great one no matter what you know.
I’m calling all these composition rules secrets, but in reality all of them are pretty well known. I just give them a little bit of a different slant because I’m primarily talking about motorcycles pictures at this point. But this one secret I’m telling you now truly is a secret or at least as close as I will probably come to a secret.
I think amateur photographers sometimes think that because a professional has had some training, or uses expensive gear, or has a crew of people, or for whatever reason, they just go out and nearly every shot they take is a keeper. This is however far from the truth. I’ve taken thousands of photos over the last few years and really only have a hand-full I would call great photos. Photography in many ways is a numbers game. When you see a professionals portfolio, or work in a gallery, it represents thousands and thousands of photos that have been taken over probably many years. Scott Kelby in his book “The Digital Photography Book, Vol. 3” says if you were to go out on a photo shoot and take 240 pictures and you got one great photo you would be doing good. He says, “A lot of folk are surprised (actually shocked) to learn that even most pros would be happy to come away with one really great shot from that 240.”
So what are the practical implications of this? Number one I think is don’t get discouraged if you go out and take several hundred photos and you only have one or two good ones. Even the pros have this kind of success rate. Number two obviously is to take a lot of photos. But not only that if you’re doing a shoot for someone make sure you don’t rely on just one location, have two, three or even four places lined up. I’ve found many times what I thought would be a great place to shoot just didn’t work for one reason or another, while another did. So plan on your percentages being low and take a lot of pictures from every angle you can, with every lens you have or can borrow or rent, in every location you can.
These two photos that I wanted to promote my website took 195 shots to get. That really is a pretty good ratio. My fellow photographer Don Leow and I started out though at another location I thought would work. It didn’t and if I hadn’t planned on going to two locations that day we wouldn’t have gotten any usable photos. So if you’re going out to do a photo shoot I recommend always having at least, at the bare minimum, two places to take your photos. At Daytona I took over a thousand photographs and really feel I only have four or five great shots. That’s just the reality of this business. What you find is being a photographer is kind of like panning for gold. You have to look through a lot of fools gold to find the real deal. I hope as we go through these secrets that you will be training your eye not only to take good photos, but to spot them too. A lot of what you will be doing is looking through mediocre photos at best looking for good ones and that is often were the real artistry comes into play. You have to know and be able to pick out good photos.
One more thought before leaving this subject. Why do you think that this information is not common knowledge and very nearly a secret? It’s because professional photographers don’t show their average photos to people, all we see are the great ones. I’ve heard it said, and truly believe it, that a photographer is always judged by their worst shot. If you want to be known as a good photographer make sure you keep your portfolio to your absolute best. When it comes to a portfolio less not more should be our motto. It can be hard, taking photos out is not what we like to do, but believe me it has to be done and every photographer needs to do it more, I know I do.
By Tim Wemple © 2010
www.BikeRallyPhotography.com
Be sure and click on the link below to share this post with your friends on Facebook.




Saw your link from Scott Winter’s facebook page…
Okay…I’m loving your photos BUT…really four or five great shots out of a thousand?? You can do better than that!
What kind of camera do you use?
And that Ansel Adams quote is irrelevant in the digital world.
I’ve taken 12 *significant* photos in the last month.
http://kelly.halldorson.com/blog/?p=795
http://kelly.halldorson.com/blog/?p=723
Peace,
Kelly
Hi Kelly,
I guess it all depends on our definition of significant. I doubt I’ve taken a photo yet that will be as timeless and profitable as any Ansel Adams photo. To me personally significant is a photo that causes an emotional reaction in people. Which if you read any of Ansel Adams stuff I think is his definition as well. That’s hard to do, I don’t care if you have a digital camera or not. And if I could do better I would, I’m trying girl, give the guy a break. LOL
I have a Canon 5D Mark II. But these post are more about composition than equipment and how best to invoke an emotional response with our photographs.
I would be very interested in your thoughts about how you put emotion in your photos. Nice work by the way.
Thanks for your comments,
Tim
Thanks Tim!
It’s all a matter of perspective really. Ansel Adams did just black and white. His work is significant in the sense that it moved a lot of people. But it moved a lot of people because a lot of people saw it…
If I take some of his individual works. They seem to me to be very reproducible. I’m not being so arrogant as to say that *I* am as good as Ansel Adams but maybe I’m being something because what I am saying is MANY people are as good and/or better than Ansel Adams.
Now that I’ve spent the last year actually taking shots of nature (I used to just take photos of events, people and motorcycles )…I can really see how easy it is to get something moving.
…anywho onto the topics you mentioned…
I think the best way to invoke and emotional response through a photo…is to look for the emotion in the subject. Spend your time when you are not behind the lens observing people, watching how they interact and respond to different things/people in the world.
Be open and compassionate in life and you’ll be able to easily capture it in art.
Peace,
Kelly
I would definitely agree with you there are some amazing photographers out there who deserve recognition. A short time looking through flickr.com confirms that.
I guess what I’m trying to accomplish with this blog is to get people to start thinking about how to convey emotion in their work and not just to document things. I think that takes some understanding of composition, and when to go with the rules, and when to break them. Everyone now has the capability to get great photos with all the amazing cameras that are available, but it still takes some “thought” about what you are doing and why. With just a little knowledge and thought though a huge difference can be made.
As to being open and compassionate–I’m wide open. Life has taken me down some rough roads that have taught me how to feel, how to have empathy and compassion for people, and an intense desire to be real. More than anything really in life I want my life to be an open book for people to see and know I can relate to what they’re going through and care about them. I hope as you said that somehow that gets conveyed in my photos. Not sure I’m anywhere close to that happening, but it would be great if it did some day.
Thanks again for your comments Kelly,
Tim